Measuring Animal Welfare: What Can Cognition Contribute? doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5016/1806-8774.2008.v10pT91

Authors

  • Nichola M Brydges The Royal Dick Vet School, Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, UK
  • Victoria A Braithwaite School of Forest Resources & Department of Biology, Penn State University, Unive

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5016/1806-8774.2008.v10pT91

Keywords:

animal welfare, measure, cognition

Abstract

In this review, we explore a variety of techniques that are currently available to investigate the welfare of non-human animals (referred to from now on as animals) with a particular focus on studies of animal cognition. We consider some of the more traditional measures of animal welfare: biological function, physiology and inference, and discuss different ways in which we might assess welfare requirements. We then consider whether cognitive assays can help us determine what animals want or prefer, and whether it is possible to use cognition to discover the mental or affective state of an animal (i.e. positive or negative affective states). We defend that certain aspects of cognition will play a fruitful role in helping us to understand animal 'mental welfare' and, in this way, we make a case for how cognition can be usefully applied in a welfare context.

Downloads

Published

2008-12-13

Issue

Vol. 10 (2008)

Section

Theme Topic "Unraveling Animal Welfare"

License

Disclaimer The Publisher does not assume responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of product liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions or ideas contained in the reviews published by ARBS. All procedures reported are expected to conform to ethical standards; inclusion in the journal does not constitute a guarantee or endorsement of the quality or value of such procedures. Copyright Submission of a review to this periodical will be taken to imply that it represents an original unpublished text, not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Written permission to publish illustrations must be obtained by the corresponding author before submission and any acknowledgment should be included in figure captions. Terminology: Abbreviations, Acronyms, Eponyms, and Nomenclature - Define ALL abbreviations, acronyms and names of genes, gene products, proteins, and protein products at first mention. Do not use abbreviations in titles. Only universally accepted abbreviations may be used without definition. - Observe species-appropriate rules of nomenclature formatting with respect to use of upper and lower case letters and italics for both gene and protein designations. - Avoid beginning sentences with very short abbreviations or acronyms, especially those that begin with a lower case letter (such as hCG, mRNA, etc.; use “Human CG”, “Messenger RNA”, etc., in the latter instances). - Do not use the possessive form in eponymous terms: use Dulbecco Modified Eagle medium, not Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's medium; Hanks solution, not Hanks' solution; etc.